[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160618133454.38fc8fd9@bbrezillon>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:34:54 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] mtd: nand: add manufacturer specific
initialization/detection steps
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:23:01 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 55f3ab8..aadebe7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -3703,6 +3703,10 @@ static int nand_detect(struct nand_chip *chip, struct nand_flash_dev *type)
>
> chip->manufacturer.ops = nand_manuf_ids[maf_idx].ops;
>
> + if (!chip->manufacturer.ops)
> + /* assign no operations */
> + chip->manufacturer.ops = nand_manuf_ids[0].ops;
> +
BTW, this is wrong, the manufacturer id code is not the index of the
nand_manuf_ids[] table ;). If we go for this option, we should probably
declare no_ops in nand_base.c and assign it here:
chip->manufacturer.ops = nand_manuf_no_ops;
> if (!type)
> type = nand_flash_ids;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists