[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1933773.0TPXapTvBs@diego>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:15:01 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, kishon@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, xzy.xu@...k-chips.com,
briannorris@...omium.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add soc-ctl-syscon for corecfg regs
Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 16:04:27 schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> As can be seen in Arasan's datasheet [1] there are several "corecfg"
> settings in their SDHCI IP Block that are supposed to be controlled by
> software. Although the datasheet referenced is a bit vague about how to
> access corecfg, in Figure 5 you can see that for Arasan's PHY (a
> separate component than their SDHCI component) they describe the
> "phyctrl" registers as being "FROM SOC CTL REG", implying that it's up
> to the licensee of the Arasan IP block to implement these registers. It
> seems sane to assume that the "corecfg" registers in their SDHCI IP
> block works in a similar way for all licensees of the IP Block.
>
> Device tree has a model that allows a device to get a reference to
> random registers located elsewhere in the SoC: sysctl. Let's leverage
> this model and allow adding a sysctl reference to access the control
> registers for the Arasan SDHCI PHYs.
>
> Having a reference to the control registers doesn't do much for us on
> its own since the Arasan spec doesn't specify how these corecfg values
> are laid out in memory. In the SDHCI driver we'll need a map detailing
> where each corecfg can be found in each implementation. This map can be
> found using the primary compatible string of the SDHCI device. In that
> spirit, document that existing rk3399 device trees already have a
> specific compatible string, though up to now they've always been relying
> on the driver supporting the generic.
>
> Note that since existing devices seem to work fairly well as-is, we'll
> list the syscon reference as "optional", but it's likely that we'll run
> into much fewer problems if we can actually set the proper values in the
> syscon, so it is strongly suggested that any SoCs where we have a map to
> set the corecfg also include a reference to the syscon.
>
> [1]: https://arasan.com/wp-content/media/eMMC-5-1-Total-Solution_Rev-1-3.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
I was trying to find public datasheets of other arasan-5.1 users, but wasn't
sucessful. But I guess this solution should be versatile enough to support the
implementation on other socs anyway, so
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists