[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+Ln22GZu9GEyCzkywkeQz8v-dq5cpVkeGRxk15spUo=JqvgTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 23:57:30 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: samsung: exynos5433: add CPU clocks
configuration data and instantiate CPU clocks
Hi Bart,
2016-05-24 22:19 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>:
> Add the CPU clocks configuration data and instantiate the CPU clocks
> type for Exynos5433.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Please see my comments inline.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
> index 6dd81ed..9ff6160 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
[snip]
> static void __init exynos5433_cmu_apollo_init(struct device_node *np)
> @@ -3620,6 +3640,12 @@ static void __init exynos5433_cmu_apollo_init(struct device_node *np)
> ARRAY_SIZE(apollo_div_clks));
> samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, apollo_gate_clks,
> ARRAY_SIZE(apollo_gate_clks));
> +
> + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_SCLK_APOLLO, "apolloclk",
> + mout_apollo_p[0], mout_apollo_p[1], 0x200,
> + exynos5433_apolloclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5433_apolloclk_d),
> + CLK_CPU_HAS_E5433_REGS_LAYOUT);
Hmm, I guess the reason for patch 1/3 was that
exynos_register_cpu_clock() has to be called with the ctx pointer.
However samsung_cmu_register_one() returns the ctx pointer, so I guess
you could use that to avoid open-coding?
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists