lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:59:46 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Subject: N900, wl1251: wifi is now slow, even with powersave off Hi! Ping to N900: 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=187 ttl=64 time=124 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=188 ttl=64 time=131 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=189 ttl=64 time=66.7 ms ^C --- maemo ping statistics --- 189 packets transmitted, 189 received, 0% packet loss, time 188742ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.382/101.866/453.145/42.395 ms root@duo:/data/pavel# Now on n900: pavel@...0:/my/tui/ofone$ sudo iw dev wlan0 set power_save off pavel@...0:/my/tui/ofone$ That should bring ping back to < 2 msec range, but nothing changes: root@duo:/data/pavel# ping maemo PING maemo (10.0.0.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=78.5 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=101 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=18.2 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=37.5 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=58.2 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=77.6 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=98.3 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=118 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=35.8 ms 64 bytes from maemo (10.0.0.8): icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=55.7 ms ^C --- maemo ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9034ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 18.298/68.025/118.223/30.756 ms root@duo:/data/pavel# Any ideas what is going on there? Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists