[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160618203639.GH7172@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:36:39 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next v3 13/14] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add addressing
mode to info
> +struct mv88e6xxx_smi_ops {
> + int (*read)(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr,
> + int addr, int reg, u16 *val);
> + int (*write)(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr,
> + int addr, int reg, u16 val);
> +};
Hi Vivien
I still think this API should be based on ps.
With the way you have restructured probe, this now also works, there
is no longer a read without PS in order to get the device ID.
Also, think about the case of reading/writing registers via Ethernet
frames. Such functions would need ps, bus and sw_addr is not useful.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists