[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be3047c2d5e669d3e070f69b28566609@ozlabs.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:57:28 +1000
From: mpe <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
matt@...abs.org, kda@...ux-powerpc.org, paulus@...ba.org,
ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64
On 2016-06-13 15:40, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530
>>
>> > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is
>> > not yet upstream.
>> ...
>> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694
>> > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514
>>
>> Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the
>> networking
>> tree, right?
>>
>> Therefore, how would you like this to be merged?
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the
> powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc,
> unless Michael Ellerman feels differently.
>
> Michael?
Yeah I was planning to take it.
I put it in my test tree last night but it broke the build for some
configs.
Once that is fixed I'll take it via powerpc#next.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists