[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160619171531.GA25349@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 19:15:31 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Runtime PM for TPM2 CRB chips
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 05:10:25PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> These patches implement support for runtime PM with TPM2 CRB chips such
> as PTT in Skylake.
>
> This is very naive implementation since the TPM is resumed and supended
> for every transaction thus causing total 40 ms latency for each
> transaction but for the existing use cases this shouldn't be an issue.
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen (3):
> tpm_crb: fix crb_req_canceled behavior
> tpm, tpm_crb: remove wmb()'s
> tpm, tpm_crb: runtime power management
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 3 ++
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewing myself:
* I fsckd the description. The latency is whopping 400 ms, not 4 ms.
Sorry about that. Thus it's better to use autosuspend.
* Callbacks should take tpm_mutex before doing anything.
I guess that tpm_tis could later on also take advantage of this work?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists