[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUEYnKens0MDXSd4P-feRaENvnUThtxjKxgdfmW6jbzFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 14:22:42 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] x86: Rewrite switch_to() code
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> Move the low-level context switch code to an out-of-line asm stub instead of
> using complex inline asm. This allows constructing a new stack frame for the
> child process to make it seamlessly flow to ret_from_fork without an extra
> test and branch in __switch_to(). It also improves code generation for
> __schedule() by using the C calling convention instead of clobbering all
> registers.
This is great. The conflict with my stack code is minimal enough that
I won't bother rebasing unless someone specifically wants me to.
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists