linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160620064816.GB13747@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:48:16 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
Cc:	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Rui Teng <rui.teng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yiping Xu <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>,
	"fujun (F)" <oliver.fu@...ilicon.com>,
	Zhuangluan Su <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
	Dan Zhao <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>, saberlily.xia@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce ZONE_CMA

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:38:49PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote:
> Hi Kim & feng,
> 
> Thanks for the share. In our platform also has the same use case.
> 
> We only let the alloc with GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in memory.c to use cma memory.
> 
> If we add zone_cma, It seems can resolve the cma migrate issue.
> 
> But when free_hot_cold_page, we need let the cma page goto system directly not the pcp.
> It can be fail while cma_alloc and cma_release. If we alloc the whole cma pages which
> declared before.

Hmm...I'm not sure I understand your explanation. So, if I miss
something, please let me know. We calls drain_all_pages() when
isolating pageblock and alloc_contig_range() also has one
drain_all_pages() calls to drain pcp pages. And, after pageblock isolation,
freed pages belonging to MIGRATE_ISOLATE pageblock will go to the
buddy directly so there would be no problem you mentioned. Isn't it?

Thanks.