[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da441ea3-1adf-13f7-0254-82814d5055aa@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:55:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Boris Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, libvir-list@...hat.com,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: VMX: enable guest access to LMCE related MSRs
On 20/06/2016 03:49, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation!
>
> If we disable LMCE in QEMU by default (even for -cpu host), will it
> still be a problem? That is,
>
> - pc-2.7 can continue to run on old kernels unless users explicitly
> require LMCE
>
> - existing libvirt VM configurations can continue to work on pc-2.7
> because LMCE is not specified in those configurations and are
> disabled by default (i.e. no requirement for new kernels)
>
> - existing QEMU configurations/scripts using pc alias can continue to
> work on pc-27 for the same reason above.
Yes, that would be fine. "-cpu host" can leave LMCE enabled if
supported by the kernel.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists