linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1606201129060.6874@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:29:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	jic23@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chaya.golan@...el.com,
	daniel.drubin@...el.com, A.Bhattacharya@....ac.be
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID_TRANSPORT
> > > +     bool
> > > +     default n
> > > +
> > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID
> > > +     bool "Intel Integrated Sensor Hub"
> > 
> > Why can't the transport driver be built as a module?
> In current use case for PM, we don't want anyone to unload and
> complain.

Sorry, I don't understand this explanation, could you please elaborate?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs