[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1606201712470.5839@nanos>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, rt@...utronix.de,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/20] timer: Refactor the timer wheel
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:26:28PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > This is the second version of the timer wheel rework series. The first series
> > can be found here:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160613070440.950649741@linutronix.de
> >
> > The series is also available in git:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.timers
>
> Ran some longer rcutorture tests, and the scripting complained about
> hangs. This turned out to be due to the 12.5% uncertainty, so I fixed
Is that stuff so sensitive? I'm surprised, because the old slack stuff got you
6.25% already.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists