[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2j-gtak__8eW0vQh82Vge6pEQ3bDwpGoyuxEFaUiE1YCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:01:02 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 04:56:17PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
>> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
>> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
>> of struct fork_frame.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 14 ++++----------
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 10 +++-------
>> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> index 7574528..23e764c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> @@ -404,37 +404,34 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
>> * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
>> *
>> * rax: prev task we switched from
>> + * rbx: kernel thread func
>> + * r12: kernel thread arg
>> */
>> ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
>> movq %rax, %rdi
>> call schedule_tail /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>>
>> - testb $3, CS(%rsp) /* from kernel_thread? */
>> + testq %rbx, %rbx /* from kernel_thread? */
>> jnz 1f
>>
>> - /*
>> - * We came from kernel_thread. This code path is quite twisted, and
>> - * someone should clean it up.
>> - *
>> - * copy_thread_tls stashes the function pointer in RBX and the
>> - * parameter to be passed in RBP. The called function is permitted
>> - * to call do_execve and thereby jump to user mode.
>> - */
>> - movq RBP(%rsp), %rdi
>> - call *RBX(%rsp)
>> - movl $0, RAX(%rsp)
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Fall through as though we're exiting a syscall. This makes a
>> - * twisted sort of sense if we just called do_execve.
>> - */
>> -
>> -1:
>> +2:
>> movq %rsp, %rdi
>> call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
>> TRACE_IRQS_ON /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
>> SWAPGS
>> jmp restore_regs_and_iret
>> +
>> +1:
>> + /* kernel thread */
>> + movq %r12, %rdi
>> + call *%rbx
>> + /*
>> + * A kernel thread is allowed to return here after successfully
>> + * calling do_execve(). Exit to userspace to complete the execve()
>> + * syscall.
>> + */
>> + movq $0, RAX(%rsp)
>> + jmp 2b
>> END(ret_from_fork)
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to reverse the JNZ after the TESTB above and thus
> have a single label and simpler code flow (pasting the whole thing here
> because a diff is unreadable):
>
> ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> movq %rax, %rdi
> call schedule_tail /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>
> testq %rbx, %rbx /* from kernel_thread? */
> jz 1f
>
> /* kernel thread */
> movq %r12, %rdi
> call *%rbx
> /*
> * A kernel thread is allowed to return here after successfully
> * calling do_execve(). Exit to userspace to complete the execve()
> * syscall.
> */
> movq $0, RAX(%rsp)
>
> 1:
> movq %rsp, %rdi
> call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
> TRACE_IRQS_ON /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
> SWAPGS
> jmp restore_regs_and_iret
> END(ret_from_fork)
>
> It boots fine in my guest this way too.
The idea was to put the uncommon case (kernel thread) out of line for
performance reasons.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists