linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57682FC3.3070504@arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:02:43 +0100
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support



On 20/06/16 18:56, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> writes:
>
>> This series add support for SCPI based device device power state
>> management using genpd.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sudeep
>>
>> v1[1]->v2:
>> 	- Fixed the endianness handling in scpi_device_get_power_state
>> 	  as spotted by Tixy
>> 	- Renamed scpi_pd.c to scpi_pm_domain.c as suggested by Ulf
>> 	- Added Mark's ack on DT binding
>>
>> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146522850003483&w=2
>>
>> Sudeep Holla (3):
>>    firmware: arm_scpi: add support for device power state management
>>    Documentation: add DT bindings for ARM SCPI power domains
>>    firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd
>
> Other than the couple nits on specific patches,
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
>
> And just a[nother] reminder to be sure to keep things that are Juno
> specific well described since we know other vendors will be (and are
> being) "creative" in their implementations of SCPI.
>

Agreed as mentioned in the other thread.

I just sent a PR to arm-soc this afternoon. Do you think it's better to
recall it and incorporate this ?

Extremely sorry for rushing, I thought it would get too late. Ulf
reviewed them so I rushed a bit.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep