[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUo10+BYrWU__E1hC6+ri8q2x1WmGkYkK+uiffCnY7ZTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:16:22 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, clark@...hat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add 'perf bench syscall'
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] perf: add 'perf bench syscall'
>
> Add a basic 'perf bench syscall' benchmark which does a getppid() system
> call in a tight loop.
>
My one suggestion would be to use a different syscall than getppid(),
as getppid() can have unusual performance characteristics on kernels
with pid namespaces enabled. I'm a fan of prctl(-1, 0, 0, 0, 0).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists