linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3 0/8] coccicheck: modernize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160621212112.GX25646@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:21:13 +0200
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	tiwai@...e.de, ming.lei@...onical.com, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
	deepa.kernel@...il.com, chunkeey@...glemail.com,
	cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, jwboyer@...oraproject.org, jslaby@...e.com,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, hauke@...ke-m.de,
	broonie@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, markivx@...eaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mmarek@...e.com,
	johannes@...solutions.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3 0/8] coccicheck: modernize

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:02:49PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > That is sanitized as follows:
> > 
> > # spatch only allows include directories with the syntax "-I include"           
> > # while gcc also allows "-Iinclude" and "-include include"                      
> > COCCIINCLUDE=${LINUXINCLUDE//-I/-I }                                            
> > COCCIINCLUDE=${COCCIINCLUDE// -include/ --include} 
> 
> I don't get the second case.  Is it to replace -include by --include?  
> Coccinelle actually supports both, although it doesn't advertise that.  

Oh neat, yeah. So a follow up patch later can be to remove that second line?
If so as of what version of coccinelle?

> Also, in LINUXINCLUDE, what is the meaning of -include?  For Coccinelle, 
> it is not the same as -I.  It is for files that should be included that 
> are not in the set of includes seen by whatever is the specified include 
> strategy (--all-includes, etc).  The argument is a specific file name, not 
> a directory.  It is a way of eg not bothering with --recursive-includes 
> when there is one or a few key header files that each file will need.

Its used to force to include a single file, it is a file.

> > So the point is to annotate that the .cocconfig is picked up first due
> > to the fact make is used and its issued from the top level makefile
> > and starts from the top level. The fact that --dir is used is important
> > but secondary to its introduction as well.
> 
> OK, the original text seemed to me to imply that running from the kernel 
> directory was essential to getting the kernels .cocciconfig,

And what I meant to imply was that since coccicheck uses the kernel
makefiles it would kick off from kernel proper.

> so I wanted  to point out that this is not the case.

I should have elaborated with all these details, its perhaps best to be
explicit about this so I can respin with a clearer commit log.

  Luis