linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <6b457696-5cb6-66ba-911a-fec42bb3e0d3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:16:58 +0800
From:	Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:	nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, aik@...abs.ru,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	paulus@...ba.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if
 PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set\\

On 2016/6/21 9:43, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
>> The resource_alignment will releases memory resources allocated
>> by firmware so that kernel can reassign new resources later on.
>> But this will cause the problem that no resources can be
>> allocated by kernel if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set, e.g. on pSeries
>> platform because PCI_PROBE_ONLY force kernel to use firmware
>> setup and not to reassign any resources.
>>
>> To solve this problem, this patch ignores resource_alignment
>> if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c |    6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index c8b4dbd..a259394 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -4761,6 +4761,12 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>   	spin_lock(&resource_alignment_lock);
>>   	p = resource_alignment_param;
>>   	while (*p) {
>> +		if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>> +			printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Ignore resource_alignment parameter: %s with PCI_PROBE_ONLY set\n",
>> +					p);
>> +			*p = 0;
>> +			break;
> Wouldn't it be simpler to make pci_set_resource_alignment_param() fail
> if PCI_PROBE_ONLY is set?

I add the check here because I want to print some logs so that users
could know the reason why resource_alignment doesn't work when
they add this parameter.

Thanks,
Yongji

>> +		}
>>   		count = 0;
>>   		if (sscanf(p, "%d%n", &align_order, &count) == 1 &&
>>   							p[count] == '@') {
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev