[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621010508.GJ2279@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:05:08 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, minchan@...nel.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:19AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> just for information
Thank you for informing it.
>
> there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks
> for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch
> some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post
> RFC [may be tomorrow].
>
> -ss
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists