[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621011537.GP1521@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:15:37 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] clk: sunxi-ng: Add fixed factor clock support
On 06/07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +
> +#include "ccu_common.h"
> +
> +struct ccu_fixed_factor {
> + u16 div;
> + u16 mult;
> +
> + struct ccu_common common;
Does this use the common structure although we have no usage for
the members of struct ccu_common except struct clk_hw? I suppose
this is done so registering a bunch of clks is easy?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists