[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_3q1W0WG1s8J=rM1aKaF86Lv0XFp=eviPBR3fwpJcx0gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:38:53 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: Add new function of_clk_is_provider()
Hi Stephen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> (Please don't top post)
Sorry about that
>
> I was thinking that of_clk_init() would mark any nodes that
> matched and provided clk providers as OF_POPULATED. That way,
> when of_platform_populate() ran, it would *not* add platform
> devices for clk providers that we registered during the
> of_clk_init() phase. Then we could have platform drivers and
> CLK_OF_DECLARE drivers for the same compatible strings, but we
> wouldn't probe random platform drivers for the nodes that we
> handled early on and we wouldn't need to litter
> of_clk_is_provider() in driver probe routines.
>
Ok, now I get it. I didn't realised that you wanted to set the flag.
I have prepared two new patches. now setup does something like:
void __init of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
{
if (!_of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(node))
of_node_set_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
}
If we probe this method to be valid, on a future stage I can make a MACRO like:
CLK_OF_DECLARE_PLATFORM(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clock",
_of_fixed_factor_clk_setup, clk_unregister_fixed_factor);
That sets the flag, instantiate MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE,
builtin_platform_driver, and does the platform_set_drvdata.....
Driver developers can choose to use CLK_OF_DECLARE_PLATFORM or CLK_OF_DECLARE
Thanks!
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists