[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57690F83.80709@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:27:23 +0530
From: Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
To: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>, "Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>,
"J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>
CC: "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kristo, Tero" <t-kristo@...com>,
"Gerlach, Dave" <d-gerlach@...com>,
"paul@...an.com" <paul@...an.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: AM43XX: hwmod: Fix RSTST register offset for pruss
On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:22 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> Hi Suman,
>
> Anna, Suman wrote on Monday, June 20, 2016 9:49 PM:
>
>> It does happen when the pruss module is exercised. We found this when we
>> tried to do a standby test on suspend, and while it worked on AM33xx,
>> AM437x failed because of this difference.
>
> Okay, seems on am335x, PER doesn't have RSTST register itself.
Seems like code has some reference!
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm33xx.h
#define AM33XX_RM_PER_RSTST_OFFSET 0x0004
But TRM: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruh73m/spruh73m.pdf
claims that offset is reserved.
Should i remove the above lines altogether?
>
> Regards
> afzal
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists