linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:23:17 +0000
From:	Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
To:	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
CC:	<libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<arnd@...db.de>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<marcus.shawcroft@....com>, <philb@....org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
	<pinskia@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote:

> Please review it. Any comments appreciated.

General comments:

Please make sure you go through all the review comments from the previous 
patch series posted in Oct 2014 and either address them, or explicitly 
justify why you think they are incorrect or not applicable to this version 
of the series.  That's both my comments and comments from other people.

Please make sure you follow the GNU Coding Standards throughout.  Also 
glibc standards such as every file having a one-line description before 
the copyright notice.

Please send patches against current master, not 2.23.  Each new revision 
of the series should be rebased against the latest master.

Please give details of the test results you see running the full glibc 
testsuite with this patch series under the indicated kernel version.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@...esourcery.com