linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] device property: Add function to search for named child of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1466504574.30123.196.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:22:54 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J.Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] device property: Add function to search
 for named child of device

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:20 +0000, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote:
> There still seems to be an issue with this patch set reaching the
> linux-acpi mailing list (as well as the other vger.kernel.org lists).
> Have
> spent some time looking into it but so far can't see anything
> obviously wrong
> with the mail format. Also tried to reduce down the number of people
> on the
> To/Cc list

There is still _a lot_ of addresses in the Cc and To fields.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy