linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: wd7000: print sector number as 64-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:41:20 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: wd7000: print sector number as 64-bit

On Monday, June 20, 2016 9:12:50 PM CEST Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> 
> As sector_t can be 32-bit wide, this adds a cast to 'u64' and prints
> that with the correct format. The change to use no_printk()
> 
> [...]
> 
> +       dprintk("wd7000_biosparam: dev=%s, size=%lld, ",
> +               bdevname(bdev, b), (s64)capacity);
> 
> s64?
> 
> Why not unsigned long long like we usually do with sector_t?

The printk() was using %d as the format string, printing it
as a signed number, so I did not change it.

Using %llu makes sense though, I've resent it like that.

	Arnd