[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mvmk2hipyfw.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:34:59 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: "Zhangjian \(Bamvor\)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<pinskia@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
<manuel.montezelo@...il.com>, <linyongting@...wei.com>,
<maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com> writes:
>> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> #define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x100000000)
>> -#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
>> +#define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? \
>> TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
>> -#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
>> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(tsk) ? \
> It should be
> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk)) ? \
> is_compat_thread takes "struct thread_info *thread" while TASK_SIZE_OF takes
> "struct task_struct *tsk"tsk.
If that doesn't throw an error does that mean that TASK_SIZE_OF is
unused?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists