linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:42:47 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:08:29AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> 
> On inspection, I note that the arch/tile/include/atomic_32.h header has
> 
> ATOMIC64_OP(and)
> ATOMIC64_OP(or)
> ATOMIC64_OP(xor)
> 
> but these should be ATOMIC64_OPS, plural.

Bugger, I'll go fix. Clearly nobody has tilepro toolchains :/

> Peter, what toolchain were you using for tilepro build testing? 

tilegx-linux-

> You need to have a tilepro toolchain (not tilegx) 

Ah, should I go use TARGET=tilepro-linux ?

> and build with ARCH=tilepro.

        tilepro)
                ARCH=tile
                CROSS_COMPILE=tilegx-linux-
                if [ "$CONFIG" == "defconfig" ] ; then
                        CONFIG=tilepro_defconfig
                fi
                ;;

So I suppose that too is wrong.