[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621131912.GA6060@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:19:12 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
airlied@...hat.com, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: mediatek: remove IOMMU_DMA select
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:15:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2016 22:11:07 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We get a harmless build warning when trying to use the mediatek
> > DRM driver with IOMMU support disabled:
> >
> > warning: (DRM_MEDIATEK) selects IOMMU_DMA which has unmet direct dependencies (IOMMU_SUPPORT)
> >
> > However, the IOMMU_DMA symbol is not meant to be used by drivers
> > at all, and this driver doesn't seem to have a strict dependency
> > on it other than using the mediatek IOMMU driver that does.
> >
> > Since we also want to be able to do compile tests with the
> > driver on other platforms, the IOMMU_DMA symbol should not
> > be selected here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
> > If someone has a better explanation about why the 'select' is here,
> > let me know, it certainly seems out of place.
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean to send this as a reply to "More build fixes for
> omapdrm in current -next", I copied the wrong command line.
>
> I'll resend it if necessary.
That's probably the reason why patchwork didn't include the commit
message in the downloaded mbox. I've pieced it together manually and
applied this to topic/drm-misc.
Thanks,
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists