[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621134240.GA8086@amd>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:42:40 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
David Jaša <djasa@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, sandyinchina@...il.com,
Jason Cooper <cryptography@...edaemon.net>,
John Denker <jsd@...n.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] /dev/random - a new approach
Hi!
> 6. You have a significant lack of data regarding embedded systems, which is
> one of the two biggest segments of Linux's market share. You list no
> results for any pre-ARMv6 systems (Linux still runs on and is regularly used
> on ARMv4 CPU's, and it's worth also pointing out that the values on
> the
Feel free to contribute more test results.
I mean... you can't expect every person who wants to improve something
in linux to test on everything in the world... can you?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists