[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c751e92-9dcb-a42c-7ecb-764d3974c1e4@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:20:39 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21
On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream gcc/binutils/etc
>>> so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I put
>>> up a while ago [1] that you could grab if you wanted to try it.
>> I usually build my own set -- and just did. But tilepro was not
>> included. Lemme go do so.
> binutils-2_26-branch builds for tilepro-linux
> gcc-6-branch does _not_ build for tilepro-linux
That's unexpected. I'll pass this over to our compiler folks. Thanks!
--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists