[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871t3qmw9j.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:50:16 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, robh@...nel.org,
Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
grygorii.strashko@...com,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework
Hi,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> writes:
>>> This patch introduces the usb charger driver based on usb gadget that
>>> makes an enhancement to a power driver. It works well in practice but
>>> that requires a system with suitable hardware.
>>>
>>> The basic conception of the usb charger is that, when one usb charger
>>> is added or removed by reporting from the usb gadget state change or
>>> the extcon device state change, the usb charger will report to power
>>> user to set the current limitation.
>>>
>>> The usb charger will register notifiees on the usb gadget or the extcon
>>> device to get notified the usb charger state. It also supplies the
>>> notification mechanism to userspace When the usb charger state is changed.
>>>
>>> Power user will register a notifiee on the usb charger to get notified
>>> by status changes from the usb charger. It will report to power user
>>> to set the current limitation when detecting the usb charger is added
>>> or removed from extcon device state or usb gadget state.
>>>
>>> This patch doesn't yet integrate with the gadget code, so some functions
>>> which rely on the 'gadget' are not completed, that will be implemented
>>> in the following patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Li Jun <jun.li@....com>
>>> Tested-by: Li Jun <jun.li@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig | 7 +
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c | 770 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/usb/charger.h | 191 ++++++++++
>>> include/uapi/linux/usb/charger.h | 31 ++
>>> 5 files changed, 1000 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/usb/charger.h
>>> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/usb/charger.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig
>>> index 2057add..89f4e9b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig
>>> @@ -134,6 +134,13 @@ config U_SERIAL_CONSOLE
>>> help
>>> It supports the serial gadget can be used as a console.
>>>
>>> +config USB_CHARGER
>>> + bool "USB charger support"
>>
>> you didn't build test all possibilities, did you?
>>
>> I have a feeling this won't link if USB_GADGET=m. Can you test that?
>
> OK.
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c
>> [...]
>>> +struct class *usb_charger_class;
>>
>> We already have a UDC class, do we really, really need another class
>> here?
>
> We want to manage the usb charger devices by this class and one usb
> charger device is not equal with one usb device which managed by UDC
Can you explain this statement? If charging is done via a USB peripheral
port, why don't we have a 1:1 mapping between charger and UDC?
> class, so can we use UDC class to manage charger devices?
> By the way, you also suggested to use the 'class' things instead of
> 'bus' in previous mail.
true, I did say that. It seems clearer, however, that we don't need this
virtual device here.
>>> +subsys_initcall(usb_charger_class_init);
>>
>> this should always work as module_init(). Please make sure that's the
>> case.
>
> we should make sure the charger class has been allocated before user
> try to add a new gadget to the udc class. So it should be issued
> before 'module_init()' (many usb drivers are at module_init level).
-EPROBE_DEFER?
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists