[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621152447.GE3262@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:24:47 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, evvers@...ru, kernel-team@...com,
John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>,
Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernfs/for-4.7-fixes] kernfs: don't depend on
d_find_any_alias() when generating notifications
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:51:17PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> kernfs_notify_workfn() sends out file modified events for the
> scheduled kernfs_nodes. Because the modifications aren't from
> userland, it doesn't have the matching file struct at hand and can't
> use fsnotify_modify(). Instead, it looked up the inode and then used
> d_find_any_alias() to find the dentry and used fsnotify_parent() and
> fsnotify() directly to generate notifications.
>
> The assumption was that the relevant dentries would have been pinned
> if there are listeners, which isn't true as inotify doesn't pin
> dentries at all and watching the parent doesn't pin the child dentries
> even for dnotify. This led to, for example, inotify watchers not
> getting notifications if the system is under memory pressure and the
> matching dentries got reclaimed. It can also be triggered through
> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches or a remount attempt which involves shrinking
> dcache.
>
> fsnotify_parent() only uses the dentry to access the parent inode,
> which kernfs can do easily. Update kernfs_notify_workfn() so that it
> uses fsnotify() directly for both the parent and target inodes without
> going through d_find_any_alias(). While at it, supply the target file
> name to fsnotify() from kernfs_node->name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Evgeny Vereshchagin <evvers@...ru>
> Fixes: d911d9874801 ("kernfs: make kernfs_notify() trigger inotify events too")
> Cc: John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>
> Cc: Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>
> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.16+
> ---
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure this is the best way to deal with this but it at least
> works fine. If there's a better, please let me know. If this
> approach is okay, in the future, maybe we want to implement a helper
> on fsnotify side to handle notification generation from back-end side?
Greg, can you please pick this one up?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists