| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:49:47 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rfi@...ts.rocketboards.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 19/25] PCI: rcar Gen2: Request host bridge window
resources
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:41:00PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:26:23AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Valentine]
> >
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> > Hi Geert,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for testing this, and sorry for the breakage.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > Request host bridge window resources so they appear in ioport_resource and
> > > > iomem_resource and are reflected in /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 4 ++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > > index 9980a4b..617a6b2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int rcar_pci_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > > > struct rcar_pci_priv *priv = sys->private_data;
> > > > void __iomem *reg = priv->reg;
> > > > u32 val;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > >
> > > > pm_runtime_enable(priv->dev);
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> > > > @@ -275,6 +276,9 @@ static int rcar_pci_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > > > /* Add PCI resources */
> > > > pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &priv->io_res);
> > > > pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &priv->mem_res);
> > > > + ret = devm_request_pci_bus_resources(priv->dev, &sys->resources);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > >
> > > > /* Setup bus number based on platform device id / of bus-range */
> > > > sys->busnr = priv->busnr;
> > >
> > > This patch (commit 1bd019707b7c9249d34c5d348f1ef75eb4d83e89 in pci/next)
> > > broke PCI on r8a7791/koelsch. Dmesg differences are:
> > >
> > > pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI: bus0 revision 11
> > > -pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> > > -pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0xee080000-0xee0810ff]
> > > -pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xee080000-0xee0810ff]
> >
> > This is probably a result of this code in drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c:
> >
> > /*
> > * The controller does not support/use port I/O,
> > * so setup a dummy port I/O region here.
> > */
> > priv->io_res.start = priv->mem_res.start;
> > priv->io_res.end = priv->mem_res.end;
> > priv->io_res.flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
> >
> > We try to avoid adding dummy regions like this, but maybe we missed
> > this one. I haven't found any email discussion about it yet, so I
> > don't know what the reason for this one is. Valentine, do you
> > remember?
>
> I do not, but I think I've found something in my mailbox.
> Below is the quote from the original conversation with:
> (Re: [PATCH] pci: Add R-Car Gen2 internal PCI support)
>
> [quote starts]
> >>+ priv->mem_res = *mem_res;
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * The controller does not support/use port I/O,
> >>+ * so setup a dummy port I/O region here.
> >>+ */
> >>+ priv->io_res.start = priv->mem_res.start;
> >>+ priv->io_res.end = priv->mem_res.end;
> >>+ priv->io_res.flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
> >>
> > I don't understand this. There's no requirement (at least as far as the
> > PCI core is concerned) to supply an I/O aperture at all, and I think it
> > would be better if you didn't.
> >
> > Oh, I see ... maybe pcibios_init_resources() forces you to have an
> > I/O resource to avoid having it give you a default one? And I
> > suppose that since you have several host bridges, these dummy I/O
> > regions have to be distinct. Ugh. Well, I guess this is something
> > you'd have to fix here or in the ARM code, it's up to you what to do.
>
> Exactly. This is to avoid assigning default I/O resources.
> [quote ends]
Oh, right, now I remember. Thanks for digging that out.
I propose the patches below to remove the requirement for having an
I/O space. Any chance one of you could test them?
commit 8387e687f72747b994c54e29e31861f0db07eb0c
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:54:29 2016 -0500
ARM: Make PCI I/O space optional
For callers of pci_common_init_dev(), we previously always required a PCI
I/O port resource. If the caller's ->setup() function had added an I/O
resource, we used that; otherwise, we added a default 64K I/O port space
for it.
There are PCI host bridges that do not support I/O port space, and we
should not add fictitious spaces for them.
If a caller sets struct hw_pci.io_optional, assume it is responsible for
adding any I/O port resource it desires, and do not add any default I/O
port space.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
index 0070e85..2d88af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct hw_pci {
struct msi_controller *msi_ctrl;
struct pci_ops *ops;
int nr_controllers;
+ unsigned int io_optional:1;
void **private_data;
int (*setup)(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *);
struct pci_bus *(*scan)(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
index 05e61a2..65f12ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static int pcibios_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
return irq;
}
-static int pcibios_init_resources(int busnr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
+static int pcibios_init_resource(int busnr, struct pci_sys_data *sys,
+ int io_optional)
{
int ret;
struct resource_entry *window;
@@ -420,6 +421,14 @@ static int pcibios_init_resources(int busnr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
&iomem_resource, sys->mem_offset);
}
+ /*
+ * If a platform says I/O port support is optional, we don't add
+ * the default I/O space. The platform is responsible for adding
+ * any I/O space it needs.
+ */
+ if (io_optional)
+ return 0;
+
resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &sys->resources)
if (resource_type(window->res) == IORESOURCE_IO)
return 0;
@@ -466,7 +475,7 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
if (ret > 0) {
struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
- ret = pcibios_init_resources(nr, sys);
+ ret = pcibios_init_resource(nr, sys, hw->io_optional);
if (ret) {
kfree(sys);
break;
commit eeb4d6cdf8960c484c5a6eb9b310145b75a59ec1
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Date: Tue Jun 21 09:19:34 2016 -0500
PCI: rcar: Drop gen2 dummy I/O port region
Previously we added a dummy I/O port region even though the R-Car
controller doesn't support PCI port I/O. This resulted in bogus root bus
resources like this:
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0xee080000-0xee0810ff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xee080000-0xee0810ff]
Drop the unused dummy I/O port region and set struct hw_pci.io_optional so
the ARM PCI code doesn't add a default one for us.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
index 9980a4b..ddf7765 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@
struct rcar_pci_priv {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *reg;
- struct resource io_res;
struct resource mem_res;
struct resource *cfg_res;
unsigned busnr;
@@ -273,7 +272,6 @@ static int rcar_pci_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
rcar_pci_setup_errirq(priv);
/* Add PCI resources */
- pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &priv->io_res);
pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &priv->mem_res);
/* Setup bus number based on platform device id / of bus-range */
@@ -371,14 +369,6 @@ static int rcar_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
priv->mem_res = *mem_res;
- /*
- * The controller does not support/use port I/O,
- * so setup a dummy port I/O region here.
- */
- priv->io_res.start = priv->mem_res.start;
- priv->io_res.end = priv->mem_res.end;
- priv->io_res.flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
-
priv->cfg_res = cfg_res;
priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
@@ -421,6 +411,7 @@ static int rcar_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
hw_private[0] = priv;
memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw));
hw.nr_controllers = ARRAY_SIZE(hw_private);
+ hw.io_optional = 1;
hw.private_data = hw_private;
hw.map_irq = rcar_pci_map_irq;
hw.ops = &rcar_pci_ops;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists