[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2228716.yrSLSS60Ke@tauon.atsec.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:16:15 +0200
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH] crypto: use timespec64 for jent_get_nstime
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 10:12:24 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
>
> So this is definitely more clear then what was described earlier, and
> worries me because on many x86 machines (though fewer I guess these
> days then in the past) the clocksource will often not be the TSC (and
> have lower resolution).
Please note, the use of the ktime_get_raw_ns() is *only* used as a fallback on
architectures where random_get_entropy / get_cycles is not implemented.
So, on X86 and on many other arches, this function call will never be
triggered.
...
>
> But please just make sure the reason why you're using that specific
> interface is clearly documented in the code so we don't have to later
> reverse engineer the intent.
Will do.
@Arnd: I would prepare a patch then using ktime_get_raw_ns and providing a
good documentation in the code.
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists