linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160622145415.2a005cdb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:54:15 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64
 tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c

between commit:

  b67a8b29df7e ("arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  29af59a63ef1 ("arm64: dma-mapping: constify attrs passed to internal functions")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 46a4157adc17,0ef620a34c4e..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@@ -30,9 -29,7 +30,9 @@@
  
  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
  
 +static int swiotlb __read_mostly;
 +
- static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
+ static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(const struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
  				 bool coherent)
  {
  	if (!coherent || dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE, attrs))