[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466581044.3188.34.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:37:24 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, rt@...utronix.de,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/20] timer: Refactor the timer wheel
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 13:26 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is the second version of the timer wheel rework series. The first series
> can be found here:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160613070440.950649741@linutronix.de
>
> The series is also available in git:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.timers
FWIW, testing with ltp, I noticed a new failure in logs. It turns out
to be intermittent, but the testcase mostly fails.
rtbox:~ # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/sigtimedwait/sigtimedwait_1-1.run-test
Test FAILED: sigtimedwait() did not return in the required time
time_elapsed: 1.197057
...come on, you can do it...
rtbox:~ # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/sigtimedwait/sigtimedwait_1-1.run-test
Test PASSED
#define ERRORMARGIN 0.1
...
if ((time_elapsed > SIGTIMEDWAITSEC + ERRORMARGIN)
|| (time_elapsed < SIGTIMEDWAITSEC - ERRORMARGIN)) {
printf("Test FAILED: sigtimedwait() did not return in "
"the required time\n");
printf("time_elapsed: %lf\n", time_elapsed);
return PTS_FAIL;
}
Looks hohum to me, but gripe did arrive with patch set, so you get a note.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists