[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160622100206.GV26668@lukather>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:02:06 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] rtc: ac100: Add clk output support
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:52:15AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> + /*
> + * The ADDA 4 MHz clock is from the codec side of the AC100,
> + * which is likely a different power domain. However, boards
> + * always have both sides powered on, so it is impossible to
> + * test this.
> + */
If that ADDA clock is exposed by the codec, why are you putting it in
the RTC?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists