[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.yjge1dkz2s3iss@ecaz>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:21:03 +0200
From: "Imre Kaloz" <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
"Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BCM5301X ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BCM5301X ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Set GPIO enabling USB power on Netgear
R7000
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:23:18 +0200, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
> On 21 June 2016 at 16:29, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:26:11 +0200, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 June 2016 at 14:22, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there any reason you are not handling this properly as a regulator
>>>> with
>>>> usb-nop-xceiv?
>>>
>>>
>>> We can't use USB NOP PHY as we need a specific PHY driver for
>>> Broadcom's
>>> USB.
>>
>>
>> I see. That shouldn't stop you from addressing the regulator part, tho
>> ;)
>
> How? Be more specific please.
>
Instead of blindly enabling a GPIO, you should define that GPIO line as a
fixed regulator and make the USB phy driver handle it. Take a look at
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7776ab70d75ff9857343e44e428744d81c30ce1b
for example.
Imre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists