lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:46:12 +0300
From:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ed Swierk <eswierk@...portsystems.com>
Cc:	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration
 capabilities

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0700, Ed Swierk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ed Swierk <eswierk@...portsystems.com> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > @@ -461,9 +461,19 @@ ssize_t tpm_getcap(struct device *dev, __be32 subcap_id, cap_t *cap,
> >                 tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4);
> >                 tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = subcap_id;
> >         }
> > +
> >         rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, desc);
> > +
> > +       if (!rc &&
> > +           ((subcap_id == TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT &&
> > +             be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length) != TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5) ||
> > +            (subcap_id == TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION &&
> > +             be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length) != TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 4)))
> > +               rc = -EINVAL;
> > +
> 
> Woops, a totally innocuous last-minute (post-testing) cleanup broke
> this code; should be TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 20 and + 16. I'll push out v8
> as soon as I redo my tests.

OK, that's cool. Haven't yet got into testing it anyway.

1. This is too late for 4.8 release.
2. I'm on four week leave starting from week after next week but before
   I go to my leave I will apply these commits to my master branch so that
   they get exposure.
3. I try to do testing for my part before going to the leave.

> --Ed

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ