[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576A711D.5080206@semihalf.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:06:05 +0200
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, rjw@...ysocki.net, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com,
shijie.huang@....com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com
Cc: al.stone@...aro.org, mw@...ihalf.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
Catalin.Marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ddaney.cavm@...il.com,
okaya@...eaurora.org, andrea.gallo@...aro.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support
On 22.06.2016 12:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 21/06/16 08:12, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> Sorry for jumping out late, just one comment below.
>>
>> On 2016/6/20 19:02, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>> IORT shows representation of IO topology for ARM based systems.
>>> It describes how various components are connected together on
>>> parent-child basis e.g. PCI RC -> SMMU -> ITS. Also see IORT spec.
>>>
>>> Initial support allows to detect IORT table presence and save its
>>> root pointer obtained through acpi_get_table(). The pointer validity
>>> depends on acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap because if acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap
>>> is not set while using IORT nodes we would dereference unmapped pointers.
>>>
>>> For the aforementioned reason call iort_table_detect() from acpi_init()
>>> which guarantees acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap to be set at that point.
>>>
>>> Add generic helpers which are helpful for scanning and retrieving
>>> information from IORT table content. List of the most important helpers:
>>> - iort_find_dev_node() finds IORT node for a given device
>>> - iort_node_map_rid() maps device RID and returns IORT node which provides
>>> final translation
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +
>>> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +
>>> drivers/acpi/iort.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/iort.h | 30 +++++++
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static acpi_status
>>> +iort_match_node_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = context;
>>> +
>>> + switch (node->type) {
>>> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT: {
>>> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>>
>> ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER is used here, so ...
>>
>>> + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(dev->fwnode);
>>> + struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>>> +
>>> + if (!adev)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + ncomp = (struct acpi_iort_named_component *)node->node_data;
>>> +
>>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(adev->handle,
>>> + ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer))) {
>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Can't get device full path name\n");
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!strcmp(ncomp->device_name, (char *)buffer.pointer))
>>> + return AE_OK;
>>
>> ... we need to kfree(buffer.pointer) before we return or break.
>
> For the record, I've queued this patch on top:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> index 496dcf6..3b9e55b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,15 @@ iort_match_node_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(adev->handle,
> ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer))) {
> dev_warn(dev, "Can't get device full path name\n");
> - break;
> - }
> + } else {
> + int match;
>
> - if (!strcmp(ncomp->device_name, (char *)buffer.pointer))
> - return AE_OK;
> + match = !strcmp(ncomp->device_name, buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_os_free(&buffer);
> +
> + if (match)
> + return AE_OK;
> + }
>
> break;
> }
>
>
> assuming that Rafael is OK with the general approach, of course.
>
Thanks Marc. As Lorenzo pointed out, we need another fix for
iort_node_map_rid(). Do you want me to refresh the whole series or this
patch only?
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists