[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160622121551.GF9208@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:15:51 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com,
vdavydov@...allels.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
hughd@...gle.com, riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm, oom_reaper: How to handle race with oom_killer_disable() ?
On Wed 22-06-16 14:08:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 22-06-16 19:57:17, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > That being said I guess the patch to try_to_freeze_tasks after
> > > oom_killer_disable should be simple enough to go for now and stable
> > > trees and we can come up with something less hackish later. I do not
> > > like the fact that oom_killer_disable doesn't act as a full "barrier"
> > > anymore.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I'm OK with calling try_to_freeze_tasks(true) again for Linux 4.6 and 4.7 kernels.
>
> OK, I will resend the patch CC Rafael and stable.
Ohh, I've just realized that 449d777d7ad6 ("mm, oom_reaper: clear
TIF_MEMDIE for all tasks queued for oom_reaper") went in in this merge
window. So I've asked to push it to the next 4.7 rc.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists