linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Properly set corecfg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <576A85E1.3010309@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:34:41 +0300
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	kishon@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
	xzy.xu@...k-chips.com, briannorris@...omium.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, groeck@...omium.org,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Properly set
 corecfg_baseclkfreq on rk3399

On 20/06/16 20:56, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In the the earlier change in this series ("Documentation: mmc:
> sdhci-of-arasan: Add soc-ctl-syscon for corecfg regs") we can see the
> mechansim for specifying a syscon to properly set corecfg registers in
> sdhci-of-arasan.  Now let's use this mechanism to properly set
> corecfg_baseclkfreq on rk3399.
> 
>>>From [1] the corecfg_baseclkfreq is supposed to be set to:
>   Base Clock Frequency for SD Clock.
>   This is the frequency of the xin_clk.
> 
> This is a relatively easy thing to do.  Note that we assume that xin_clk
> is not dynamic and we can check the clock at probe time.  If any real
> devices have a dynamic xin_clk future patches could register for
> notifiers for the clock.
> 
> At the moment, setting corecfg_baseclkfreq is only supported for rk3399
> since we need a specific map for each implementation.  The code is
> written in a generic way that should make this easy to extend to other
> SoCs.  Note that a specific compatible string for rk3399 is already in
> use and so we add that to the table to match rk3399.
> 
> [1]: https://arasan.com/wp-content/media/eMMC-5-1-Total-Solution_Rev-1-3.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>