[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b30fd96-dc04-13a2-aa8b-7760a85337c6@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:41:42 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not
On 22/06/2016 04:34, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> pfn_valid check is not sufficient because it only checks if a page has a struct
> page or not, if for example "mem=" was passed to the kernel some valid pages
> won't have a struct page. This means that if guests were assigned valid memory
> that lies after the mem= boundary it will be passed uncached to the guest no
> matter what the guest caching attributes are for this memory.
How can you pass memory after the mem= boundary to the guest?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists