linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160622114704.5b0c97eb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:47:04 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the arm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c

between commit:

  062993b15e8e ("drm: convert DT component matching to component_match_add_release()")

from the arm tree and commit:

  84601dbdea36 ("drm: sti: rework init sequence")

from the drm-misc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
index 8abb57a94651,96bd3d08b2d4..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
@@@ -340,14 -320,79 +320,84 @@@ static int compare_of(struct device *de
  	return dev->of_node == data;
  }
  
 +static void release_of(struct device *dev, void *data)
 +{
 +	of_node_put(data);
 +}
 +
+ static int sti_init(struct drm_device *ddev)
+ {
+ 	struct sti_private *private;
+ 
+ 	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
+ 	if (!private)
+ 		return -ENOMEM;
+ 
+ 	ddev->dev_private = (void *)private;
+ 	dev_set_drvdata(ddev->dev, ddev);
+ 	private->drm_dev = ddev;
+ 
+ 	mutex_init(&private->commit.lock);
+ 	INIT_WORK(&private->commit.work, sti_atomic_work);
+ 
+ 	drm_mode_config_init(ddev);
+ 
+ 	sti_mode_config_init(ddev);
+ 
+ 	drm_kms_helper_poll_init(ddev);
+ 
+ 	return 0;
+ }
+ 
+ static void sti_cleanup(struct drm_device *ddev)
+ {
+ 	struct sti_private *private = ddev->dev_private;
+ 
+ 	if (private->fbdev) {
+ 		drm_fbdev_cma_fini(private->fbdev);
+ 		private->fbdev = NULL;
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(ddev);
+ 	drm_vblank_cleanup(ddev);
+ 	kfree(private);
+ 	ddev->dev_private = NULL;
+ }
+ 
  static int sti_bind(struct device *dev)
  {
- 	return drm_platform_init(&sti_driver, to_platform_device(dev));
+ 	struct drm_device *ddev;
+ 	int ret;
+ 
+ 	ddev = drm_dev_alloc(&sti_driver, dev);
+ 	if (!ddev)
+ 		return -ENOMEM;
+ 
+ 	ddev->platformdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ 
+ 	ret = sti_init(ddev);
+ 	if (ret)
+ 		goto err_drm_dev_unref;
+ 
+ 	ret = component_bind_all(ddev->dev, ddev);
+ 	if (ret)
+ 		goto err_cleanup;
+ 
+ 	ret = drm_dev_register(ddev, 0);
+ 	if (ret)
+ 		goto err_register;
+ 
+ 	drm_mode_config_reset(ddev);
+ 
+ 	return 0;
+ 
+ err_register:
+ 	drm_mode_config_cleanup(ddev);
+ err_cleanup:
+ 	sti_cleanup(ddev);
+ err_drm_dev_unref:
+ 	drm_dev_unref(ddev);
+ 	return ret;
  }
  
  static void sti_unbind(struct device *dev)