[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576AD8C9.7050109@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:28:25 -0400
From: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 05/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
On 06/13/2016 08:45 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:22:47 -0400
> David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/13/2016 02:50 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:10:29 -0400
>>> David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 5 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 4 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h | 60 ++++
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h | 44 +++
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 18 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c | 144 +++++++++
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h | 35 +++
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c | 526 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure why kprobes.c and kprobes-arm64.c are splitted.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This comes from the model of the arm32 kprobes code where handling of
>>>> the low-level instruction simulation is implemented in separate files
>>>> for 32-bit vs. thumb instructions. It should make a little more sense
>>>> in the future when additional instruction simulation code will hopefully
>>>> be added for those instructions we cannot currently single-step
>>>> out-of-line. It also probably *could* be merged into one file.
>>>
>>> Hmm, at least the name of arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c is
>>> meaningless. As we've done in x86, I think we can make it
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes/decode-insn.{c,h}
>>>
>>
>> I've changed the name to kprobe-decode-insn.[hc], or do you feel
>> strongly the three kprobes source files in arch/arm64/kernel need their
>> own subdirectory?
>
> Yes, especially when we start working on kprobes-on-ftrace support,
> it is better to have a separate file for that.
>
I've reorganized the kprobes source files into their own subdirectory
and changed some of their names.
> Thank you!
>
>
Thanks,
-dl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists