[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576B0F57.3030700@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:21:11 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
mhocko@...e.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, hughd@...gle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, adrian.hunter@...el.com, dedekind1@...il.com,
hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, david@...ma-star.at,
david@...morbit.com, alex@...tthing.co, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, rvaswani@...eaurora.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, shailendra.capricorn@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Don't blindly assign fallback_migrate_page()
Am 17.06.2016 um 01:11 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:26:13 +0200 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>
>> While block oriented filesystems use buffer_migrate_page()
>> as page migration function other filesystems which don't
>> implement ->migratepage() will automatically get fallback_migrate_page()
>> assigned. fallback_migrate_page() is not as generic as is should
>> be. Page migration is filesystem specific and a one-fits-all function
>> is hard to achieve. UBIFS leaned this lection the hard way.
>> It uses various page flags and fallback_migrate_page() does not
>> handle these flags as UBIFS expected.
>>
>> To make sure that no further filesystem will get confused by
>> fallback_migrate_page() disable the automatic assignment and
>> allow filesystems to use this function explicitly if it is
>> really suitable.
>
> hm, is there really much point in doing this? I assume it doesn't
> actually affect any current filesystems?
>
> [2/3] is of course OK - please add it to the UBIFS tree.
Pushed 2/3 and 3/3 into UBIFS next tree.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists