[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160622223747.323544906@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:46:43 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 80/81] netfilter: x_tables: dont reject valid target size on some architectures
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
commit 7b7eba0f3515fca3296b8881d583f7c1042f5226 upstream.
Quoting John Stultz:
In updating a 32bit arm device from 4.6 to Linus' current HEAD, I
noticed I was having some trouble with networking, and realized that
/proc/net/ip_tables_names was suddenly empty.
Digging through the registration process, it seems we're catching on the:
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
Where next_offset seems to be 4 bytes larger then the
offset + standard_target struct size.
next_offset needs to be aligned via XT_ALIGN (so we can access all members
of ip(6)t_entry struct).
This problem didn't show up on i686 as it only needs 4-byte alignment for
u64, but iptables userspace on other 32bit arches does insert extra padding.
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Fixes: 7ed2abddd20cf ("netfilter: x_tables: check standard target size too")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int xt_compat_check_entry_offsets(const
return -EINVAL;
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
- target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
+ COMPAT_XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target)) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
/* compat_xt_entry match has less strict aligment requirements,
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ int xt_check_entry_offsets(const void *b
return -EINVAL;
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
- target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
+ XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target)) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
return xt_check_entry_match(elems, base + target_offset,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists