[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1466658701-23894-1-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:11:41 +0800
From: <>
To: helgaas@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, rjw@...ysocki.net, tony.luck@...el.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rui.y.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86/ioapic: Support hot-removal of IOAPICs present during boot
From: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@...el.com>
On Wed, June 22, 2016 11:15 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -1779,8 +1780,12 @@ void __init
> > pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
> > {
> > struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> >
> > - list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
> > + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) {
> > pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > + acpi_ioapic_add(ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge));
> > +#endif
>
> Doesn't this do the right thing even if you omit the #ifdefs, since you
> define a stub function below?
>
No. Without the '#ifdef CONFIG_X86' it breaks MIPS arch. The stub function is
within 'ifdef CONFIG_ACPI'. On archs without ACPI it doesn't compile due to
'undefined reference to acpi_ioapic_add'.
Thanks
Rui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists