lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZQpUTx2mpgt0U6u1RS9B-ZfMYHVNO_3iYYqCeVt=2rKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:34:51 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: of: drop needless gpio_chip look-up in of_parse_own_gpio()

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:

> This function is doing more complicated than needed.  The caller of
> this function, of_gpiochip_scan_gpios() already knows the pointer to
> the gpio_chip.  It can pass it to of_parse_own_gpio() instead of
> looking up the gpio_chip by gpiochip_find().
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Patch applied!

First I was worried about this semantic change:

> -       chip_np = np->parent;
> +       chip_np = chip->of_node;

But then I read up on the code and saw that of_gpiochip_add() sets
it to the parent if not set before.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ