lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:56:53 +0200 From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nd <nd@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@....com>, philb@....org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@...esourcery.com>, Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com> writes: > So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles > between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32 > and LP64? Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is aarch32 on aarch64? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists