linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] power/idle: enhance the precision of sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:18:11 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...aro.org>
cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Geng Ren <geng.ren@...eadtrum.com>,
	Alex Wang <alex.wang@...eadtrum.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	Zhaoyang Huang (黄朝阳) 
	<zhaoyang.huang@...eadtrum.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] power/idle: enhance the precision of
 sleep_length

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> On 23 June 2016 at 15:01, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Thomas, I agree with you, I have discussed the modification with the
> call back owner. However, I wonder if we can make the idle's framework
> to be more precised without the assumption of short CPU_PM_ENTER
> callbacks. Thank you!

What's the point? To help people who put insanities into the idle code path?

Thanks,

	tglx